CO129-501-8 General policy in China 30-11-1926 - 30-11-1926 — Page 9

even if fir F. Aglen's

The define that

dismissal

Hi dinct noult

جاس

this cod. have happened in

に

any

Lighty contrōrasial.

Reash Lighty

Say

165 lsh

indictment against thi

Fo

ら

J Fo

2

Can

The

policy

is 16

9

that by revealing

publicly the differences between the Powers they

actually

incited

the Peking Wort. to order

instead of

the Cuslims Kroked the läxes

From

frhowing Hi Cambini example and seling up special machinary for the purpose. this indictment, and eff from the reponsibility

for Sir F. Aglen's dismissal, they cannot escape.

It is open to question whethe thy raking

up the past saves

and

any

areful purpose

I should have Larilated to send the dsp.

1 Fo

at this junctive

But

The Fo

people in

China Lan commented

OL

il

and

14: Regy

Ich he that Fo are

asking

for

a

cupy

We can

(I have not

M 20/4

or done

almost

every

hardly theirfor hold it back.

Dupl. Is Fo Lif. without comment

of It's Irinsed 16:

delayed

references nahastoma to the corres. quoted

page of His desp

1004 A

But this sh5.

action has been liken)

Tillitssuck

20/4 4321

on